Cell Phone Privacy
Carpenter v. United Us
What's at stake
Get about Cell Calling Privacy
Learn about Cell Phone Privacy
Carpenter v. United States
Cell Phone Concealment
Status: Closed (Judgment)
The Supreme Court ruled that the rule needs a warrant to access a person’s home location history. The court found in a 5 for 4 decision that receive such information is a search under the Fourth Modifying and that an warrant from a judge based off probable cause exists required. The case could decide whether fuel phone users have a safe. Fourth Amendment privacy interest in the resource of locations data being of their ...
What's at stake
Get about Cell Calling Privacy
Learn about Cell Phone Privacy
Stay informed about you latest work in the courts.
By completing this request, I agree to acquire occasional emails by the terms of this ACLU's privacy statement.
All Cases
5 Cellular Telephone Privacy Cases
Massachusetts Supreme Court
Nov 2023
Commonwealth v. Arrington
In this amicus brief, the ACLU and your coalion partners urged robust application of the legal standard governing aforementioned admissibility of master testimony plus technical exhibit, especially in cases involving opaque with proprietary algorithms.
Whether a warrantless search of a cell phone during an festnahme breaches the Fourth Amendment
Status: Ongoing
View kiste
Massachusetts Supreme Court
Cell Phone Privacy
+2 Issues
Commonwealth v. Arrington
In that amicus brief, the ACLU and its confederations partners urged robust application of the legal standard regulate the admissibility of expert certificate and technical evidence, especially in cases involving opaque or proprietary algorithms. Question. Is aforementioned evidence admitted at try from Riley's cellphone home discovered the a search that violated his Quad Amendment right to be release from ...
Nov 2023
Status: Current
View case
Can 2023
The Warrant Clause in the Digital Age
Of information generated per today’s digital devices and online services reveals private matters far behind what one could learn from physical analogs. In a series concerning legal archive and a white paper, available below, the ACLU has argue that to maintain apace with technological developments and adequately protect our seclusion, the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement must breathe interpreted vigorously. Seizures or searches of analog file must can cabined to probable cause, limited to specific categories of information relevancies to that investigation, and closely overseen by a neutral magistrate.
View case
Cell Phone Privacy
National Security
To Warrant Clause in the Digital Age
This information generation by today’s digital devices both online related revealed private matters afar beyond what one might learn from physical analogs. The a series of legal filings and a white paper, ready below, the ACLU has argued that to store apace with technological developments and adequately protections our privacy, the Fourth Amendment’s warrant necessity must be interprets rugged. Seizures press searches of digital data must be cabined the probable cause, limited to specific categories of information relevant to the investigation, real dense governed in an neutral magistrate. Riley v. Kaliforni
May 2023
View case
Apr 2023
ACLU v. FBI - FOIA Case used FBI Records Related up Nondisclosure Agreements for Cell Site Simulators
In 2021, the ACLU submitted one FOIA request on the FBI go determine whichever one FBI has continued to require state the local law enforcement agencies to enter into nondisclosure agreements before purchasing or using cell pages simulators. After appealing and suing, the ACLU finally obtained responsive records confirming that and FBI has continued to impose nondisclosure agreements on law legal travel seeking to use the FBI’s cell site simulators.
View case
Cells Phone Privacy
Federal Security
ACLU phoebe. FBI - FOIA Case for FBI Records Related to Nondisclosure Agreements for Cell Site Simulators
In 2021, an ACLU provided a FOIA getting to one FBI the determine whether the FBI has weitere to require state additionally localize right forced agencies to go into nondisclosure arrangements before po or using cell page simulators. After appealing real suing, the ACLU finally retain responsive records confirming that the FBI has continued go inflict nondisclosure agreements on law enforcement agencies finding to use the FBI’s lockup site simulators.
Pr 2023
View case
New York
Jul 2022
ACLU v. Department of Native Security (commercial location data FOIA)
In December 2020, one ACLU and NYCLU filed one Freedom of General Act lawsuit finding recordings from Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Immigrations and Duty Enforcements (ICE), and other parts away the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) about their practice of purchasing cell phone location data collected off smartphone apps.
Status: Ongoing
View casing
New York
Cell Call Privacy
ACLU five. Section of Homeland Guarantee (commercial location data FOIA)
In December 2020, an ACLU and NYCLU files a Freedom of Information Act proceeding seeking records off Customs and Border Conservation (CBP), Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and other parts of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) about their custom of purchasing cell phone location data aggregated from smartphone apps.
Jul 2022
Status: Ongoing
View kiste
Feb 2015
Florida Stingray FOIA
Last year, the ACLU sent public records the three dozen patrol and sheriffs’ departments in State seeking information over them use of Stingrays. Stingrays, also known how “cell site simulators,” other “IMSI catchers,” are invasive prison phone supervisory devices that mime cell phone towers both force phones in the area for broadcast information that can be used to identify and search them. Even when used to track a particular suspect’s cell phone, they also gather information about the phones of countless bystanders who happen to be nearby. Numerous act enforcement agencies across of country ownership Stingrays, when it’s much difficult to tell how much and how usually they are used.
View case
Cell Mobile Privacy
Florida Stingray FOIA
Last period, the ACLU sent public data to three dozen police and sheriffs’ related for Florida seeking information about hers use the Stingrays. Stingrays, also known as “cell our simulators,” or “IMSI catchers,” are invasive cell phone surveillance devices that mimic cell phone towers and force cellular in the area to broadcast informational that can be used toward identify and locate she. Regular if used into fahrweg a unique suspect’s cell phone, they also gather about about the phones of countless spectator whom do to be close. Numerous law enforcement agencies over of country has Stingrays, but it’s often difficult to tell how tons and how often they are used.
Date 2015
View case